Projects

HiveOps

Multi-Agent AI / Incident Response · 2026

Five specialized LLM agents collaborate on incident triage, root cause, remediation, sandboxed verification, and evidence assembly, with human approval gates.

React · FastAPI · Supabase · Claude · WebSockets

The HiveOps web app showing the multi-agent incident response dashboard.

Problem

Incident response is slow and hard to audit. A single LLM in the loop is opaque and risky to let act on production.

Solution

Five specialized agents each own one step of the incident, from triage to a human-readable evidence dossier. Structured SQL memory replaces vector embeddings so retrieval is explainable, and human approval is enforced at the data-model level so no backend path executes without a prior approval record.

What I Built

Each incident moves through five specialized agents, one per step. A triage agent classifies severity, assigns a causal signature, and extracts the affected service. A root cause agent correlates the errors with recent deploys and config diffs. A remediation agent queries the SQL memory for past incidents and proposes a fix, which a verification agent then runs in a mocked sandbox to assess side effects before anything touches production. A reviewer agent assembles the whole trail into a human-readable evidence dossier. Alongside them, QueenBee offers on-demand chat with the full incident context already loaded.

Technical Details

  • React, TypeScript, Vite, Tailwind, Framer Motion
  • FastAPI async Python
  • Structured SQL memory via the Hex API instead of vector embeddings
  • Confidence-based escalation, Claude Haiku to Sonnet below 0.70
  • Supabase Postgres with Realtime, WebSockets and SSE
  • Deployed on Vercel and Render

What I Learned

  • Structured SQL memory buys explainability that vector search cannot.
  • Enforcing human approval at the data model, not the UI, closes the unsafe-action gap.
  • Splitting an incident across specialized agents makes each step auditable.